Political Bimbo

CLICK ON THE PICTURE FOR A FULL ANIMATED EFFECT. Okay, with all do respect to women and only as it pertains to politics, Sarah Palin is not that much more than a “political bimbo.” Can someone please point out to me what else is going on here? What are her qualities? What public good or purpose can she possibly serve? Let me put it this way, “She’s NO Eleanor Roosevelt.” Yes this cartoon is sexist…we’re going rogue and making an exception for her but it is intentionally sexist mostly to make the point. Ask yourself, would she be a phenomenon of any kind among conservatives if she were overweight, old and/or ugly? Duh, so if you’re cute and talk dirty you can have a future in politics (to some even the presidency)? So how twisted, ugly and sexist is that? And besides, she’s exploiting it to the max…making money...and pointing fingers “back” on top of that. This is just nothing more (and nothing less) than a form of political porn and “political masturbation” for repressed minds...what else? One thing is good though, she has actually helped advance the women’s cause...you can safely say now that “woman are just as capable of being as stupid and vile as men”. Thanks again Sarah for the opportunity to try to make sense out of total nonsense. And yes thanks to her, reality has now become "officially" crazier -and funnier- than fiction. If you disagree or have a reasonable less “crazy” angle please enlighten me, I’m always willing to stand corrected.

KW: political humor, comedy, comedians, comics, comic books, cartoons, funny stuff, political cartoons, humor, free stuff, movies, video games, games, free games, download games, PC games, Play Station games, X-box games, PS3, PSP, X Box, online games, entertainment, arts, graphics, fonts, clipart, artist, books, graphic novels, netflix, cinema, animation, anime, new releases.

General Obama!!

Well, I don’t know about you but Cheney is “dithering”* me out…so what’s his point, “thinking it through” is a bad thing?...as opposed to what? Being “decisive” in jumping in front of a bus (Iraq)? What? Should we tell future generations that they should be “decisive” and cross the street without looking (“left and right”) for upcoming danger first? What then? Having a decisive “W” was not bad enough? So how about “a decisive” Sarah Palin as “commander in chief”? Wow! Not that it’s going to happen but that’s a scary thought isn’t it (like the worst “B” horror or disaster flick that even Hollywood can’t dream up)? Hmmm, some food for thought…how about a Sarah Palin (the dithering queen) and Cheney ticket for 2012 (in that order)?

*Dithering: “Dithering” in graphic artist terms means the “breaking down” of solid colors into dots to represent gradations in color that a computer or printing device cannot handle. Like dissolving the color “wearing” it down (so keep that in mind also when reading).

So after how much blood and treasure is Iraq “manageable” again (if it last)? At the time of the invasion I had argued with my friends on the right that “aside” from ideologies and political views that from a “strictly practical” stand point the invasion seemed like a “stupid” decision…with my friends on the left I’d argue that maybe “we” can’t be that dumb and that there may have been some kind of “think-tank” well understood (but secret) geo-political reason behind it all (like to setup shop to “stop” the Chinese…the real enemy of our way of life). And then it turns out to be that “yes” they were even more stupid that we suspected… and that the universal notion -aside from the very neo-cons that screwed up in the first place- is that the “Iraq invasion” was stupid at best. Heck, even gas prices went up…way up, and then the economy tanked.  So was that just stupid, or stupid…and reckless? To be smart and arrogant is bad, but to be stupid and arrogant is a disaster.

Now just for the sake of argument and in response as to how quick “the far right” (and the not so far right) is to make despotic and inflammatory statements even when not factual. So how about this? What does the constitution say about premeditatedly plunging the nation into war under false pretenses? Let’s ask Sarah…hey Sarah, does that sound “constitutionally” to you? Or just “treasony”?